Old Polish Cookery for Beginners: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


== A Collection of Dishes ==
== A Collection of Dishes ==
The book in question, first published in 1682, was written by Stanisław Czerniecki (pronounced ''stah-{{small|NEE}}-swahf churn-{{small|YET}}-skee''), a steward and chef at the court of the Princes Lubomirski. He gave it a bilingual, Latin-Polish, title, ''Compendium ferculorum, albo Zebranie potraw'' (''A Collection of Dishes''), but the contents were entirely in Polish (contrary to what Ms. Mary Ellen Snodgrass suggested in her ''Encyclopedia of Kitchen History'', where she described ''Compendium ferculorum'' as Poland's "Latin standard"<ref>{{Cyt  
The book in question, first published in 1682, was written by Stanisław Czerniecki (pronounced ''stah-{{small|NEE}}-swahf churn-{{small|YET}}-skee''), a steward and chef at the court of the Princes Lubomirski. He gave it a bilingual (Latin-Polish) title, ''Compendium ferculorum, albo Zebranie potraw'' (''A Collection of Dishes''), but the contents were entirely in Polish (contrary to what Ms. Mary Ellen Snodgrass suggested in her ''Encyclopedia of Kitchen History'', where she described ''Compendium ferculorum'' as Poland's "Latin standard"<ref>{{Cyt  
  | nazwisko = Snodgrass  
  | nazwisko = Snodgrass  
  | imię    = Mary Ellen
  | imię    = Mary Ellen
Line 13: Line 13:
  | rok      = 2004
  | rok      = 2004
  | strony  = 270
  | strony  = 270
  }}</ref>) Czerniecki was well aware that his was the first cookbook ever published in his native tongue. "As no one before me has yet wished to present to the world such useful knowledge in our Polish language," he wrote in his opening line, "I have dared, {{...}} despite my ineptitude, to offer my {{...}} collection of dishes to the Polish world."<ref>{{Cyt  
  }}</ref>). Czerniecki was well aware that his was the first cookbook ever published in his native tongue. "As no one before me has yet wished to present to the world such useful knowledge in our Polish language," he wrote in his opening line, "I have dared, {{...}} despite my ineptitude, to offer my {{...}} collection of dishes to the Polish world."<ref>{{Cyt  
  | nazwisko = Czerniecki
  | nazwisko = Czerniecki
  | imię    = Stanisław
  | imię    = Stanisław
Line 23: Line 23:
  }}, Dedication, own translation</ref> The author divided his work into three chapters of about one hundred recipes each, for meat dishes, fish dishes and other dishes, respectively.
  }}, Dedication, own translation</ref> The author divided his work into three chapters of about one hundred recipes each, for meat dishes, fish dishes and other dishes, respectively.


The recipes, though, are not easy to read or follow. First, they're in Polish. But even you did speak Polish, you'd still have to wade through 17th-century Polish spelling, interpunction and typeface. Let's tak the example below. You can probably make out the name of the dish, printed in roman type, but what about the actual recipe, written in blackletter?
The recipes, though, are not easy to follow. First, they're in Polish, which may be an inconvenience, if you don't speak the language. But even you did, you'd still have to wade through 17th-century Polish spelling, interpunction and typeface. Let's take the example below. You could probably make out the name of the dish, printed in roman type, but what about the actual recipe, written in blackletter?


[[File:Compendium 15.jpg|600px|Potráwá żołta w&nbsp;dobrey iuſze, álbo po Krolewſku. Weźmiy Járząbká álbo Kuropátwę/ Ptáßki álbo Gołembie/ Kápłoná álbo Cielęćinę/ álbo co chceß/ wymocz/ ſpuść w&nbsp;gárniec/ zaſol/ odwarż/ odbierz/ nácedz znowu tym roſołem/ y pietrußki włoż/ á gdy dowiera/ wley Gąßczu/ Octu/ ſłodkośći/ Száfranu/ Pieprzu/ Cynámonu/ Rozenkow oboygá/ Limoniy/ przywarz á dáy ná miſę.]]
[[File:Compendium 15.jpg|600px|Potráwá żołta w&nbsp;dobrey iuſze, álbo po Krolewſku. Weźmiy Járząbká álbo Kuropátwę/ Ptáßki álbo Gołembie/ Kápłoná álbo Cielęćinę/ álbo co chceß/ wymocz/ ſpuść w&nbsp;gárniec/ zaſol/ odwarż/ odbierz/ nácedz znowu tym roſołem/ y pietrußki włoż/ á gdy dowiera/ wley Gąßczu/ Octu/ ſłodkośći/ Száfranu/ Pieprzu/ Cynámonu/ Rozenkow oboygá/ Limoniy/ przywarz á dáy ná miſę.]]
Line 32: Line 32:
{{Cytat
{{Cytat
| '''Yellow Dish in Good Sauce, in the Royal Style'''<br>
| '''Yellow Dish in Good Sauce, in the Royal Style'''<br>
Take a hazel grouse or a partridge, small birds or pigeons, a capon or veal, or whatever [kind of meat] you want; soak in water, put in a pot, salt, bring to boil, debone, cover again with the stock, add parsley; and when boiling, add coulis [thick vegetable sauce], vinegar, sugar, saffron, pepper, cinnamon, both kinds of raisins, limes; bring to boil and serve in a bowl.
Take a hazel grouse or a partridge, small birds or pigeons, a capon or veal, or whatever [kind of meat] you want; soak in water, put in a pot, salt, bring to boil, debone, cover again with the stock, add parsley; and when boiling, add coulis [thick vegetable sauce], vinegar, sugar, saffron, pepper, cinnamon, both kinds of raisins, and limes; bring to boil and serve in a bowl.
| oryg ='''Potrawa żółta w&nbsp;dobrej jusze, albo po królewsku'''<br>
| oryg ='''Potrawa żółta w&nbsp;dobrej jusze, albo po królewsku'''<br>
Weźmij jarząbka albo kuropatwę, ptaszki albo gołębie, kapłona albo cielęcinę, albo co chcesz; wymocz, spuść w&nbsp;garniec, zasól, odwarz, odbierz, nacedź znowu tym rosołem i&nbsp;pietruszki włóż; a&nbsp;gdy dowiera, wlej gąszczu, octu, słodkości, szafranu, pieprzu, cynamonu, rożenków obojga, limonij; przywarz, a&nbsp;daj na misę.
Weźmij jarząbka albo kuropatwę, ptaszki albo gołębie, kapłona albo cielęcinę, albo co chcesz; wymocz, spuść w&nbsp;garniec, zasól, odwarz, odbierz, nacedź znowu tym rosołem i&nbsp;pietruszki włóż; a&nbsp;gdy dowiera, wlej gąszczu, octu, słodkości, szafranu, pieprzu, cynamonu, rożenków obojga, limonij; przywarz, a&nbsp;daj na misę.
Line 46: Line 46:
  }} }}
  }} }}


That better, isn't it? But I bet you'd still have a hard time actually cooking from this recipe. Where's the list of ingredients? Where are the quantities and proportions? What about caloric contents? Cooking time and temperatures? How many people does it serve? We've got used to taking certain elements of a cooking recipe for granted, but it turns out they just hadn't been invented yet in the 17th century.  
That's better, isn't it? But I bet you'd still have a hard time actually cooking from this recipe. Where's the list of ingredients? Where are the quantities and proportions? What about caloric contents? Cooking time and temperatures? How many people does it serve? We've got used to taking certain elements of a cooking recipe for granted, but it turns out they just hadn't been invented yet in the 17th century.  


[[File:Nowy Wiśnicz z&nbsp;powietrza.jpg|thumb|left|The castle of Nowy Wiśnicz, which was once the family seat of the Princes Lubomirski; this is where Stanisław Czerniecki worked as a steward and chef, and where he wrote down his recipes in the first cookbook printed in Polish.]]
[[File:Nowy Wiśnicz z&nbsp;powietrza.jpg|thumb|left|The castle of Nowy Wiśnicz, which was once the family seat of the Princes Lubomirski; this is where Stanisław Czerniecki worked as a steward and chef, and where he wrote down his recipes in the first cookbook printed in Polish.]]
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
Another thing we take for granted is that it's usually the same person who buys a cookbook, reads it and cooks according to its recipes. In the 17th century, though, it was quite normal for these three roles to be separated. The book would have been purchased by someone who could afford it, that is, a rich nobleman or a magnate (the Polish equivalent of an aristocrat). Or, rather, it would have been his wife, the lady of the house. She wouldn't have bought the book for herself, however, but for the head chef (or "master cook") she'd had employed. It was the head chef's job to manage the entire kitchen staff, order the necessary ingredients from external suppliers and make decisions about what would be served on the lord's table (having agreed the menu and the costs with the lady). So the recipes in the cookbook would have been read by the head chef an experienced professional who didn't need all the proportions, temperatures and cooking times, because he already kept this knowledge in his head. But here comes another twist: he would have read the recipes aloud – not to himself, but to the kitchen staff, who would actually carry the instructions out. We can tell this by the grammatical forms used in the book; it's always the singular second-person imperative, indicating a direct order that you could issue to your subordinate, but never to a magnate's wife (the owner of the book). Czerniecki, for example, would have never addressed his own employer, Princess Helena Tekla Lubomirska, by the familiar "''ty''" ("thou"), but consistently called her "Your Princely Grace, my Most Charitable Lady and Benefactress".
Co więcej, przyzwyczailiśmy się też do tego, że na ogół ta sama osoba kupuje książkę kucharską, czyta ją i&nbsp;gotuje potrawy według jej przepisów. W&nbsp;XVII&nbsp;w. natomiast te trzy role często bywały rozdzielone. Książkę kupował ktoś, kogo było na nią stać, czyli magnat lub zamożny szlachcic, a&nbsp;raczej jego żona, czyli pani jego domu. Z&nbsp;tym że kupowała ją nie tyle dla siebie, ile dla zatrudnionego przez nią kuchmistrza, który zarządzał całym personelem kuchennym, zamawiał potrzebne składniki u&nbsp;zewnętrznych dostawców i&nbsp;odpowiadał za to, co znajdzie się na pańskim stole – uzgadniając jadłospis i&nbsp;poziom wydatków z&nbsp;panią domu. Przepisy czytał więc kuchmistrz doświadczony profesjonalista, który nie potrzebował proporcji, czasów i&nbsp;temperatur, bo to wszystko miał w&nbsp;głowie. I&nbsp;czytał zapewne na głos – nie sobie, ale kuchcikom, którzy zawarte w&nbsp;przepisach polecenia faktycznie wykonywali. Skąd to wiemy? Chociażby z&nbsp;użytych w&nbsp;książce form gramatycznych („weźmij”, „daj”, „odwarz”, „nacedź”), których Czerniecki z&nbsp;pewnością nie użyłby w&nbsp;stosunku do choćby swojej własnej pracodawczyni, księżnej Heleny Tekli Lubomirskiej, do której w&nbsp;dedykacji konsekwentnie zwraca się ''per'' „Wasza Książęca Mość, Pani moja i&nbsp;Dobrodziejka Wielce Miłościwa”.  


Wróćmy do przepisu. Co my tu właściwie mamy? Mięso zaprawione na kwaśno, słodko i&nbsp;ostro. Większość Polaków zapewne tak wyobraża sobie może kuchnię indyjską czy tajską, ale nie staropolską. A&nbsp;jednak, ci Staropolacy, których było na to stać, takie właśnie połączenia smakowe cenili najwyżej i&nbsp;takich w&nbsp;książce Czernieckiego znajdziemy najwięcej. Czy warto więc męczyć się w&nbsp;odtwarzanie tych przepisów, jeśli efekt może okazać się dla nas zupełnie niejadalny?
Let's go back to the recipe. What do we have here? Stewed meat with sweet, sour and spicy seasoning; taste combinations that most Poles today would consider typical for Indian or Thai cuisines, but never for Old Polish cookery. And yet, this is exactly the kind of cooking that the Polish lords of yore would have priced the most and this is what we will find throughout Czerniecki's cookbook. So does it even make sense to recreate these old recipes, if the final effect may well turn out inedible to our modern palates?


== Eggy Recipes ==
== Eggy Recipes ==