Open main menu

Changes

Good Humour, Good Health

2 bytes removed, 23:50, 21 September 2020
Actually, let's start with that last criterion: how can dietetics help maintain the current (God-given) social order? How do you make sure that peasants and town folk don't even dream of eating the same food that the nobility does? One way, which has been practised for a long time, is to simply forbid them to eat above their station by enacting sumptuary laws. But it's not a very effective one; tell a man this or that dish to elite for him to eat and he will make a point of eating it only to show that he does belong to the elite. But what if you make him believe that such food unhealthy for him? This is where the dietitians come in. All they've had to do is to demonstrate that the humoral constitution of those who engage in physical labour, in close contact with earth and sun, is completely different than in those born not to work. And if so, then, absolutely logically, whatever is healthy for the latter is deleterious to the former and vice versa. Farmers, porters, soldiers and sailors should never consume fresh white bread, poultry or fruits, as these foodstuffs, while perfectly good for the high-born, would only serve to plaster their stomachs. And, conversely, the kind of food that befits working people, such as stale rye bread, gruel, cheese, salted herringe, legumes and root vegetables, would be completely undigestible for the higher tiers of the society.
For example, here's what a Polish 16th-century pharmacist had to write about such as pedestrian a pedestrian vegetable as garlic:
{{ Cytat